Terraform, CloudFormation, or Serverless Framework? How to Choose the Best IaC Tool
Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) has become the backbone of modern cloud management, helping teams automate deployments and reduce manual errors. But with so many options available, the big question remains: Terraform, CloudFormation, or Serverless Framework; what’s the best IaC tool for your cloud infrastructure?
In this guide, we’ll compare the three most popular Infrastructure-as-Code tools:Terraform, AWS CloudFormation, and Serverless Framework. We’ll highlight their strengths, weaknesses, and ideal use cases. Whether you’re running AWS-only, multi-cloud, or building serverless-first applications, this comparison will help you make the right choice.
What Each Tool Does
AWS CloudFormation is AWS’s own tool for IaC. You define your infrastructure in YAML or JSON templates, and CloudFormation provisions everything as stacks. Since it’s AWS-native, it generally supports new AWS services quickly, often before third-party tools, though sometimes AWS CDK now gets updates even faster.
Terraform, from HashiCorp, is designed to be cloud-agnostic. It uses its own config language, HashiCorp Configuration Language (HCL), to manage resources on AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Kubernetes, and many other providers. If you’re running multi-cloud or hybrid, Terraform is a strong choice.
Serverless Framework zooms in on a more specialized use case: event-driven and serverless applications. It abstracts away most of the “infra” pain, making it easier to deploy Lambda functions, API Gateways, and other serverless services with minimal configuration. Under the hood, it actually generates CloudFormation templates, but with far less verbosity.
Quick Comparison
Provider Support:
CloudFormation is AWS-only. Terraform is multi-cloud. Serverless Framework is AWS-first but offers community plugins for Azure, GCP, and more.
• Syntax:
CloudFormation uses YAML/JSON; Terraform uses HCL; and Serverless blends YAML with an extensible plugin system.
• State Management:
CloudFormation handles state automatically as stacks. Terraform requires explicit state management (e.g., S3 + DynamoDB or Terraform Cloud). Serverless hides most of this complexity.
• Best Fit:
CloudFormation = AWS-only setups.
Terraform = multi-cloud.
Serverless = serverless-first projects.
When to Use Each
If you’re deep into AWS, CloudFormation is probably the path of least resistance. It integrates seamlessly, you don’t have to manage state, and it usually supports new AWS services quickly. Downside? Templates are verbose, and you’re locked into AWS; fine for regulated environments or AWS-centric teams, but limiting if you need flexibility.
For multi-cloud, Terraform is hard to beat. Its plan-and-apply workflow, versioned state, and rich ecosystem of community modules make it a go-to for large DevOps teams. Just note that it comes with some complexity: you’ll need to manage state storage yourself and accept a slight delay in new AWS feature support compared to CloudFormation or CDK.
Meanwhile, Serverless Framework caters to speed and simplicity. It abstracts away the heavy lifting of infrastructure, allowing developers to focus on code. That makes it ideal for startups or teams building event-driven apps. The downside? You’ll have less control over the underlying infrastructure and may need to combine it with Terraform or CloudFormation for non-serverless resources.
Decision Guide – Which Should You Choose?
AWS-only and regulated? → CloudFormation
Need hybrid or multi-cloud? → Terraform
Building primarily serverless apps? → Serverless Framework
Want reusable, scalable modules? → Terraform or CloudFormation StackSets
Prefer to abstract away infra complexity? → Serverless Framework
Mixing and Matching Tools
In practice, many teams don’t stick with just one. A common setup is to use Terraform for foundational infrastructure like VPCs, databases, and IAM roles, then let Serverless Framework handle Lambda deployments. Others nest CloudFormation stacks within Serverless projects, or split responsibilities between Terraform and Serverless for a best-of-both-worlds approach.
The Future of IaC
The IaC landscape keeps evolving. Tools like AWS CDK and Pulumi now enable you to write infrastructure using real programming languages, such as TypeScript and Python. Terraform offers a managed SaaS option with Terraform Cloud. Serverless Framework continues expanding its multi-cloud support. Learning the “big three” today ensures you’ll be ready for whatever comes next.
Best Practices
- Standardize templates/modules early to avoid drift.
- Keep everything under version control.
- Plan for state management and disaster recovery from the start.
- Integrate IaC into CI/CD pipelines for validation, testing, and continuous delivery.
- Choose the tool that matches your team’s skills and project needs, not just what’s trending.
FAQ
Which is better: CloudFormation or Terraform?
Neither tool is universally “better.” CloudFormation is AWS’s native IaC tool, ideal for AWS-only workloads and regulated environments where first-party services are preferred. Terraform is cloud-agnostic, works across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, and more, and is best for hybrid or multi-cloud infrastructures. Your choice depends on whether you want deep AWS integration (CloudFormation) or cross-cloud flexibility (Terraform).
Is Serverless Framework a replacement for Terraform or CloudFormation?
No. Serverless Framework focuses specifically on deploying serverless applications, such as AWS Lambda and API Gateway, by abstracting much of the infrastructure complexity. Under the hood, it actually builds on CloudFormation. In many teams, Serverless Framework complements, rather than replaces, Terraform or CloudFormation.
Can I use Terraform and Serverless Framework together?
Absolutely. A common pattern is to use Terraform for foundational infrastructure (VPCs, databases, IAM roles) and Serverless Framework for deploying the serverless application code itself. This allows you to leverage Terraform’s multi-cloud provisioning while benefiting from Serverless Framework’s rapid app deployment.
What are the main advantages of Serverless Framework over CloudFormation?
Serverless Framework abstracts away much of the verbose configuration required in CloudFormation and offers a plugin ecosystem for rapid deployment. While CloudFormation provides fine-grained AWS resource control, Serverless Framework simplifies and speeds up serverless app development, making it ideal for teams that want to focus on code rather than infrastructure.
Which IaC tool is best for multi-cloud environments?
Terraform is the clear leader for multi-cloud or hybrid environments. It supports hundreds of providers, including AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Kubernetes, and SaaS services, all from a single configuration language (HCL). This makes it the most versatile option for teams managing resources across multiple clouds.
Final Takeaway
No single IaC tool is a one-size-fits-all solution. AWS CloudFormation shines for AWS-centric and regulated environments, Terraform leads for hybrid and multi-cloud strategies, and Serverless Framework accelerates serverless app development.
For most teams, the answer isn’t either/or, it’s choosing the right combination. By understanding where each tool fits, you’ll be able to build scalable, reliable, and future-ready infrastructure.
Forged Concepts
Explore expert cloud, AWS, and DevOps insights by forged Concepts, a trusted AWS MSP
View All Posts →